PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTD. versus JUDGE DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, GUJRANWALA
Regulations 11 and 15 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act (III of 2005), Section 27 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act (XVII of 1996), Sections 5 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), and VII, R11 of the Constitution of Pakistan. , Article 199 Constitution Petition Jurisdiction of Consumer Court Complaints Against Telecommunication Companies Applicability of Telecom Consumer Protection Regulations, 2009 pp. The applicant stated that in the presence of Telecommunications Consumer Protection Regulations, 2009. Under the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, the consumer court had no jurisdiction to decide on the complaint of the respondents / complainants, that this complaint falls within the parameters mentioned in Regulation 11 of Telecom Consumer Protection Protection, 2009. And Regln of 15 of the above rules includes the procedure by which such complaints with the Petitioner Telecommunications Company were brought under federal law, therefore, any law passed by the federal government is subject to the provincial constitution The work will prevail over the Consumer Protection Code, 2009. , Was made pursuant to sections 5 and 4 of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act, 1996. There was a special law. And the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 was a common law. Therefore, the District Consumer Court had no jurisdiction to dispel the complaint. The High Court observed that the provision of special law on an article would be exempted from the application of the common law and the High Court had rejected the defendant under OVII. Ali's complaint was rejected. , R 11, accordingly, the constitutional application of the CPC was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
