MST. GHULAM SAKINA versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER (REV.)
Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), O IX, R 8 and O XVII, R 3 suit dismissed by the plaintiff's appellate court evidence, dismissed for failure to present evidence on the date of trial Retained. The plaintiff was not adequately represented at the trial court's hearing on women's inherent rights when the plaintiff was not properly represented at the date of the trial, in which case the trial court only considered O IX, R 8. Instead of closing the evidence and excluding the defendant from the evidence, the CPC declared that the heirs of the plaintiff were heirs, who claimed that she was the victim's only daughter and that the defendants were assaulting her residents. The High Court observed that only the High Court observed that the decision to prosecute women should be made after justifying their opportunity to provide adequate evidence so that they could find evidence of their contempt. OVI XVII, R 3, the new trial after the trial provided the plaintiff with a reasonable opportunity to guide the evidence to the legal malpractice causing serious misconduct of justice in applying the provisions of the CPC Finally sent to trial court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
