AZEEM MUBASHAR versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE DASKA
Sections 200, 355, 356 and 537 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Fraudulent and fraudulently supplying property, fraud of valuable security, etc. For the purpose of yogurt. Failure to inspect the complainant and prepare the memorandum in the hands of the magistrate on the same day, application of section 356 of the constitutional petition submitted by several persons as a forged document, as a fake document. The effect of the complainant's inspection on the same day was irregular which was treatable under section 373737, CRPC and the complaint on this score could not be excluded from the CRPC, section 5 355, of the Magistrate's Word. The source dealt with the record in some cases. Section 355, referred to in the CR PC, but was included in section 356, section 356 under the CR PC, CR PC, the presence of a magistrate or session judge was an essential requirement when the evidence was being recorded by the magistrate. The witnesses' statements / bore signatures were present, which shows that the complainant's statement was recorded in the presence of the magistrate, so the idea arose that the statements of the witnesses were recorded under the supervision and presence of the magistrate. A personal guide is also available. The proceedings were not thwarted by the evidence of the memorandum by the magistrates themselves because such an error was curable under section 37 under37, the CCP order was subject to unlawful interference by the magistrate. Was deleted \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
