Section 7 417 Demarcation Act (IX of section 8, 1908), banning appeal against bad application for contempt of delay in section 5, banning appeal against breach was restricted to 20 days (complainant) It is claimed that he was an illiterate man who did not know the law. And he was misled by his lawyer when the trial court on his behalf failed to identify any action by the acquitted accused whose Because of this, the complainant was prevented from filing the appeal within the stipulated period, nor was the compelling situation brought on record. Apologize for the delay in filing the appeal, nor did the complainant disclose the name of the lawyer who allegedly misled her during the trial. The trial court's controversial decision did not have the name of the lawyer appearing for the complainant, which shows that no one appeared before the trial court for the complainant. The complainant was also not alarmed because he applied for a certified copy of the unidentified decision about six days immediately after the appeal period and the current appeal was filed with a further delay of 13 days after receiving the certified copy. - There is no reason to delay filing an appeal for the present petition. The delay was granted as a result of which the appeal for acquittal was later rejected by the time limit.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
