MUHAMMAD ABID versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTH AT KARACHI
Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The present applicant of the facts of the eviction of the tenant claimed the applicant to be the owner of the premises and denied any relationship to the tenant and the landlord. The application filed by was approved by the rental controller and a revocation order was approved against it. The petitioner and the same were applied by the lower appellate court. The Validity Petitioner never admitted that in 1983, he or his father had been lured into a damaged premises as a tenant and since then. The applicant had not been demanding an increase in rent for 30 years. The landlord and the respondents filed the eviction proceedings under section 15 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, after which the applicant deliberately imposed a rent payment for 3/2 years, however, Required to be excluded Delays may be withdrawn in a negative manner against the respondents The tenant controller and lower appellate court decide on the existence of the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties and the tenant controller. Had made a mistake in holding the withdrawal request under the jurisdiction of the Constitution with the High Court. Had no jurisdiction, which resulted in the evacuation orders were rejected by the courts. The takedown request was dismissed. In the circumstances the petition was allowed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
