Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 412 of the Duty, the alleged defendant allegedly guilty of entering a home or breaking a house for a crime convicted of a felony. The homeowner had committed the robbery. The suspect was not named in the FIR. The accused was initially arrested in another case and the investigating officer submitted a petition before the magistrate stating that the present F The accused in the IR needed his request was directed by the magistrate to act. Investigation parade was held in jail with a delay of 22 days. During the interrogation parade, only one person pointed out that the accused police had not produced any witnesses before the magistrate, the recovery effect from the accused challan had already been presented. , The case was one of further investigations. Accordingly admitted on bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MORE v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1730
• AMEER BUX alias GHOUS BUX alias GHOUSO BROHI alias SUDHIR BROHI v. State 2013 YLR 1732
• ABDUL RAUF v. ARY CEMENT LIMITED 2013 CLD 1735
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. State 2013 YLR 1745
• Mst. ASMA AHTESHAM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1752
• SONERI BANK LIMITED through Constituted Attorneys/Authorized Officers v. PAK LAND CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED 2013 CLD 1756
• Mir FAIZ MUHAMMAD alias Mir FAIZULLAH v. State 2013 YLR 1758
• WAHID BUX v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1759

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

registration advocate from Talagang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes