Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ MANSOORI versus ABDUL GHANI MANSOORI

Charges for retention of Section 96 and Rev 115 Rev will be complied with for the dismissal order for prosecution even if the case was dismissed for unlawful prosecution and thus only one first appeal. Should be subject to section 66, so filing a CPC revocation against the dismissal order was not practicable. And the unclean order was unusual

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SONERI BANK LIMITED through Constituted Attorneys/Authorized Officers v. PAK LAND CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED 2013 CLD 1756
• Mir FAIZ MUHAMMAD alias Mir FAIZULLAH v. State 2013 YLR 1758
• WAHID BUX v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1759
• Peer TARIQ AHMAD v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL 2013 MLD 1763
• MUHAMMAD ABID v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTH AT KARACHI 2013 CLC 1770
• YAKOOB v. State 2013 MLD 1778
• AMAN alias AMU alias AMANULLAH v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1778
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2013 YLR 1779

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes