According to the Sessions Court, Section 6 (i) and 23 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 393 and 34 of the murder conviction, attempted robbery, terrorism act with common intention, transfer of the case from the Anti-Terrorism Court. ? The FIR accused came to a shop with the intention of robbery, and after failing, they opened fire on the accused persons, a petition filed by the accused under section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Was moved from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the Sessions Court. To determine whether the action falls within the purview of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the actions taken in the FIR and the allegations in this regard are significant. The accused persons were intentionally stopped in front of the shop. When the robbery was committed and when he was stopped, he started firing on the accused persons. According to a section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the design or purpose which has been considered has been rightfully transferred from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the Sessions Court, according to the request for review. Was deleted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
