Sections 302 and 34 of the conviction, the value of the joint intention evidence, he identified the body, which had burns on various parts of the body Medical Officer suspected that such burns were usually accidental. Or are suicidal, and the suspicion of a very rare massacre by a medical officer cannot be ruled out. It was wrong to suggest that after his death his death was sustained on wounds. The evidence on the record makes it very clear that the deceased's death was unnatural, both witnesses testified that the accused pursued the victim, but the complaining party remained silent and defenseless and in any unfortunate incident. The defendant did not follow up with the defendant. The said piece of evidence did not come to the forefront, the evidence presented by the prosecution on the extra-judicial confession was insurmountable, the evidence of the witnesses was full of irregularities and it could be so. Not to be used as concrete evidence, medical evidence raised suspicion that the case could not have been identified or intended to commit suicide. It was the prosecutor's primary duty to establish his own case independently, Instead of relying on the defense's weakness, the accused could not be sustained on the basis of proven evidence. The judgment passed by the trial court was set aside and the accused will be released in those circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
