A. XXXVII, 1r and 2 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Section 5 and Article 159 on the application of the mini suit for leave to appear and the defense against limitation suit for recovery of money, were dismissed when they Failed to submit application for leave Defendant's case within a prescribed time limit. Defendant's position was to revert to the previous injunction against him, because the delay in filing leave for his defense was due to illness. And such delay should be suspended on the respondent's summons was effected on 20 2010 2010 and the deadline for setting a ten-day deadline for filing leave and submitting an application for defense was 21 2010. Launched in 2010, the service implemented by any one of the modes should be considered a good service request. The late condolences were based on an ambiguous statement and specific dates during which she was confined to bed, and her recovery date was not disclosed in the aforementioned app. Each day was delayed, therefore, by the defendant. Was not specified when the defendant failed to appear in defense or seek leave in response to the summons offered, or where the court refused to grant leave, the defendant would have charges. The admission is considered and the claimant will be entitled to an injunction, therefore, there is an unexamined order, the appeal is dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
