The charges against the accused were the issuance of checks under Section 489F Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 367 (2) and 417, two of which were issued by the Bank Trial Court. Status. Section 489F of the PPC stated that it intended to discourage any fraudulent check or fulfill any obligation to repay the loan to prove that the check was dishonest. Was not issued with, nor was it to show to the complainant that a check was issued by the accused, which was dishonored on the offer. The complainant-appellant submitted that he was the landlord while the defendant's wife was his tenant and in order to pay his rent, the defendant-defendant gave him three checks, two of which The dishonor was done to ensure that he administered the duty on the issuer of the check. Contract with his bank for the disclosure of the check issued by him If it was shown that arrangements were made for some bank error and the check was dishonored, in the case of the issuer under section 489F. No arrangements were made by PPC and the issuer of the check from your bank in this case or even the bank account was closed and a check was issued. Then there is no doubt that this check was issued with dishonest intent The trial court failed to appreciate it in accordance with the law's settled principles. Abacus reads the evidence on the record and incorrectly reads the evidence on the record
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
