Sections 452, 337A (i), (ii), (iii), 337L ((2)) and 337F (vi) appeal to the House after pre-petition for injury, assault or misdemeanor; cause of discharge Knitting, without exposing the bone, exposing any bone and bone of the affected person; causing discomfort and separation from the other person; Was displaying enmity and hatred against the accused. They were assembled at the location of the ward, but none of them were questioned, but the independent support of the accolade account provided by the prosecution was lacking in the case, which contradicted the evidence of the witnesses, who Had made the whole matter of prosecution. As no specific role was assigned to the accused in the FIR, even the complainant and the prosecution witnesses did not specifically engage the accused, the medical evidence did not support the contents and evidence of the FIR The complainant's rifle was not stolen or taken away by the accused because the alleged contradictions shook the credibility of the eyewitnesses and led to the prosecution's delay of 6/2 hours in filing the FIR. Serious doubts were raised in the matter; it was not satisfactorily explained that the FIR was not considered for consideration and consultation. It was reported that the statements of the witnesses to the injured eye were not immediately recorded, the statement of the witnesses of the injured counsel was recorded and was prepared after about 10 10 days and the prosecution radiologist's report No explanation was offered for such a long delay by opinion. Ma
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
