Find a Lawyer

DR. FAHMIDA MIRZA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 14 and 67 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Approval of nomination papers of candidates who contested the nomination papers were accepted by the Returning Officer after rejecting the petitioner's objections and subsequent appeals as well. The election tribunal rejected the object. Was it that the BBA and BA degrees were fake and was issued by a defendant-produced bogus degree and American University and no evidence was filed by the applicant before the Election Tribunal in which It was said that the degree was fake or the fake BA degree which was produced by the other respondents confirmed the disputed facts regarding the correctness of the Election Tribunal as requested by the applicant, the defendant's education Detailed inspection of the definitions was necessary and constitutional jurisdiction could not be further investigated. This petition can easily be ruled out, although the lengthy procedure, the advertisement adopted for the verification of the BBA / BA degrees of the respondents, which could not fail the constitutional jurisdiction, Both the respondents were allowed by the High Court to contest the election, however, the case was remanded to jail on remand to answer the BBA / BA degrees of the respondents, or evidence from all parties within a specified period. After recording, the constitutional application for the same decision was dismissed by the Tribunal tax advocates from Pir Mahal lawyer