MANDVIWALLA ENTERTAINMENT (PVT.) LTD versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI
Sections 13 (1) (a), 61, 62 and 143b of the Income Tax Ordinance (XLEX of 2001), Section 133 (4) refer to the contents of the High Court for assessment, the absence of the officer's evaluating impact. The supply scope was not satisfied with the Assessing Officer. Investigation of the Income Tax Statement filed by the Assistive Notice under Sections 61 and 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was issued and on the failure to provide the required details and information, the assessment made by the Assessing Officer The Commissioner was retained by the Appeals, as well as holding the assessment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's affirmation that it had failed to produce sufficient material to support the case but, on the contrary, was unable to produce any material. In the event, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examines the review by examining the officer Was finalized. Based on the material on record, the record of its facts which did not give rise to a legal dispute was filed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal that it did not neglect any material on record and in support of the diagnostic order. For the reasons specified were inaccurate in any forum of law, the High Court did not detect any illegal or abusive order in the order sanctioned by the forum under the SC. Dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer