Find a Lawyer

EASTERN AUTO MOBILE (PVT.) LTD versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION THROUGH SECRETARY/MANAGER

Article 8, 9 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The principle of increase of rent in rent was decided by the High Court before fair rent and it was agreed between the two parties that either the rent. The increase in mutual consent or under the provisions of Section 9 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979, the landlord attempted to dismiss the tenant on the basis that he had failed to pay the rent with a 10% annual increase, A simultaneous injunction against the tenant against the tenant was approved. Either can be settled by agreement between the parties. As the landlord or tenant or tenant controller party, whether the landlord or the tenant, cannot increase or decrease the rent unilaterally, any party may at any time approach the rent controller to determine fair rent. And depending on the rental controller. Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance will be free to fix the rent mentioned in section 8 of 1979 in relation to the increase of rent after the determination of fair rent, the existing rent restrictions provided under section 9 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. This could not be equal to, or less than, or less than. This did not mean that the controller could increase the rent on an annual increase in the rent rate, which would automatically be 10% after the expiry of three years. And may increase it by less than 10% or even decrease it, not before the High Court According to the order, the tenant will have to increase the rent again by 10%. Nor was the law required to do so below law firms from Khyber Agency lawyer