Find a Lawyer

AZEEMUDDIN versus MST. ATTIQA BEGUM

Sections 10 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Withdrawal of tenants by default refusing to receive rent in payment of monthly rent, refusing to submit rent with the rent controller to avoid receiving monthly rent, the tenant deposited in rent controller. started doing it. Landlady controlled the rent seeking to evict the tenant in monthly rent payments, and the lower appellate court granted the tenant's dismissal order against the leaseholder as he refused to receive the landlord rent. This was because it demanded an increase in rent, therefore, rent was being taken out regularly, refusing to receive rent directly from the property submitted to the rent controller was not the only justification for choosing other methods. There was a justification for demanding a sudden rental of over 5000 extraordinarily high rates Was in the feudal practices. 605 rupees per month was sufficient in place of unanimous rate. There was no question of non-receipt of rent as the tenant would regularly submit to the rent controller in the name of the proprietor while letting the eviction case be filed. The year before, the tenant had been submitting the rent to the rent controller and was also under proprietary information, therefore, the tenant could not be removed on the basis of technical default and the rent controller and the lower appellate court in this case. Failed to make the decision in accordance with law, therefore, the High Court, acting in a constitutional jurisdiction, Below the wishes, in the order of excluding orders from both forums, immigration advocate from Qazi Ahmed lawyer