Find a Lawyer

SALEEM versus STATE

Sections 302, 324, 337A (ii), 337L (II), 504, 147, 148, 149 and 114 substitute the accused charged with the definition of evidence, in the theory scope incident one person was killed and others injured. Were. The accused was in the record against the witnesses, the witnesses of the injured were alive and the accused was shot dead. Ocular testimony was not adverse to medical evidence; the theory of replacing the accused was a rare occurrence, which was never used in such cases, in a public place like a hotel where other people sat. There were lights, lights and an incident was seen by the crowd. The alternative theory was mostly used in blind cases that eyewitnesses did not witness and the complainant had a name. The current issue of any individual in this case was different in view of the purpose and scale of the enmity with any individual, witnessed by eyewitnesses who supported the prosecution. His evidence was shown in the police inquest report prepared by the victim, that the victim was bleeding from the abdomen with an exception which proved his case successfully against the accused person, the trial court rightly affirmed. The convict was sentenced and the conviction of the main accused remained. Similarly, while the conviction of the other accused, who was accused of hurting the prosecution's witnesses, was already reduced property advocate from Daur lawyer