Find a Lawyer

AHMAD HUSSAIN DAR versus CHAIRMAN, WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (ii), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service to Appellant Service Tribunal Appellant Retired from Employment Under These Charges It was also alleged that he had acquired and owned the property, his known sources of income are irrelevant and he had purchased the immovable / immovable property without the permission of the appellant of the competent authority. It was held that he was living more than his sources of income, yet no formal inquiry was made against the appellant. In view of the nature of the allegations against the applicant, it was a serious prejudice not to hold an inquiry when serious allegations were made against his controversial appellant. In a manner that could be settled through a regular inquiry and in no other way did the accused authority rely on such an aspect, depending on the outcome of the formal inquiry concurred with the serious allegations leveled against the appellant. To be considered, the services approved against the appellant must The retirement order was placed with instructions that regular investigations be conducted against the appellant. The decision will be made within the period prescribed by the competent authority in accordance with the rules and the matter law websites from Patika lawyer