Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus SHABANA NAUREEN

Article 5 and Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVIII, R8 of the Constitution of the Constitution (1984 of 10), Article 129 (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Proof of Request for Evidence Principle Marriage Vacation Report of the fact-finding by the court The recording of the evidence by the court-reader filed a lawsuit to make his marriage proud because the family and the lower appellate court filed the affidavit by forcibly abducting him. The case was pronounced in favor. And Defendant's appeal submitted by the defendant was dismissed as evidence that was recorded by the reader and was not a self-judge's dispute dispute file and the complaint was also filed by the defendant. In which he gave a statement confirming his marriage, the evidence of which was separated within a minute, and under the plaintiff, the two courts simultaneously stated in vague terms that the marriage should be performed in accordance with his free will. Was not given. There can be no evidence or re-inquiry into a dispute in the jurisdiction of the Constitution, especially when no particular illegal thing was identified, so the appellate court dismissing the appeal found the decision invalid. Was that the handwriting was tailored to it. The readers could not be proved with any material evidence that the assumption of fact was connected with the judicial proceedings and was signed by the Family Court Meter, and did not fall into the mischief of Rule 8, the CPC High Court together. Refused to interfere with future decisions. Under the constitutional request, the orders passed by both the courts were dismissed in the circumstances immigration advocates from Sambrial lawyer