Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus STATE

FIRs were immediately filed under Articles 2?2 (b) /, 34, 9 evidence9 and 111111, witnesses described the role of each of the accused during the trial in vague words, and I did not have any prior hostility or malpractice against the accused, giving all the necessary details. The presence of eye-witnesses was natural at the time of the accused and the incident, which fully and consistently supported the prosecution's case, known as the prosecution witnesses; no question could be raised as to the false identity. Witnesses did not have a relationship with the victim only. The basis for the rejection of his testimony was proved by the medical evidence and the recovery received. The motive stood by self-defense, admitting that there was no evidence of recovery in the presence of overwhelming and convincing ocular evidence. Shall not be fatal in the prosecution's case and for the prosecution. With the exception of conviction, the condition of the accused was maintained and the sentence under section PP, 11, PPC, which was kept separately, for maintaining the same stolen goods and the same offense. Can't be punished separately. law websites from Lalamusa lawyer