Find a Lawyer

GULRAIZ AKHTAR versus STATE

Sections 302, 109 and 34 of the evidence were taken on a broad day and an FIR was immediately filed in which the accused was named as the perpetrator of the murder of the accused. The FIR proved that it was the original document and excluded the possibility. The complainant's presence at the time and place cannot be doubted with reports of forgery or false implications, and the presence of other witnesses at the scene at the relevant time was well explained by both witnesses. Had confirmed each other in all content. Accurate calculations of aspects of the incident and the incident that took place were presented, the time and location of the incident, the identity of the suspect, the weapons used by them and the minor contradiction of the suspect in the testimony caused by the suspect. There was a consensus about the location of the injury. The said witness, who was not very important due to the time of arrival between the events of the incident and the recording of his testimony was reliable and reliable of the witnesses presented by the trial court evidence and for a long time. Despite being subjected to cross-examination, the defense was not able to obstruct his testimony. The victim himself did not have enough to discredit his evidence, the prosecution's witness whose statement was fully proved by the prosecution's other witness, the allegation of instability and conspiracy against the accused in the house completely dismissed. And was accompanied by medical evidence from the eye witness's account with the medical witnesses. The testimony of the witnesses proved the crime and the evidence against it proved that they gave a spectacle solicitors from Killa Saifullah lawyer