Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUKHTAR AHMED versus STATE


Applicants praying for the termination of the Sections 6161A, 107 and 145 orders were granted by the Judicial Magistrate under section 145, CRPC, which was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge Petitions. Claimed that the dispute was in the possession of Ahata. Syed suit was upheld by Sec HH in 1999 for a permanent injunction, and when an invalid order has been approved to date, the petitioner's request for review is also filed by the Civil Suite Member of the Board of Revenue. The verdict was pending. The title to the occupation of the disputed property is a restriction for the commencement or continuation of proceedings under section 14545; the CCPC is charged with the threat of confiscation in such a case and allegation of relinquishment under Section 1010. Can be resolved with the assistance, the PCR of the Regional Magistrate was not legal under Section 145, the CR PC Enforcement Order was set aside

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.