Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus AZHAR AND COMPANY THROUGH AZHAR-UL-HASSAN USMAN

Section 24 (3), O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Trial of Trial under the Permanent Order with Permanent Order of Transfer of Case Order to move The non-compliance of the cases already complied with the order under which the interim order was refused to be extended under which an appeal was filed before the Additional District Judge, who also moved the case in his file. Made the same decision on the basis of some sort of settlement between the parties and the parties. For the transfer of cases under Section 24, the CPC does not have the High Court or District Judge but the Additional District Judge who can decide the appeals but not transfer the case to the Additional District Judge for litigation purposes. Could, according to them, be subordinated to the District Judge. Section 24 (3), the provisions of the CPC and the transfer order from the District Judge or the High Court of Appeal Court were to be sought before the trial court, appealing the trial court on the basis of inter-party adjudication. But thus, the course was not adopted which practiced thoroughly through the Court of Appeal, the fisherman was held, a novel method of awarding the default contractor was adopted by the Court of Appeal Cannabis cannot be supported on the basis of any canon known to the administration of justice, the Appellate Court has no committee to resolve the matter. Shakeel was not an option until it was also the bearer of such a practice trial court relied default under the settlement. Appellate Court jurisdiction without jurisdiction patent advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer