Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus BASHIR AHMAD NASIR

Section 2 302 (b) / evidence 34 Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was twisted and the facts were dismissed The FIR was filed by the victim's mother about the incident which was later denied and the incident. After more than three years, another prosecution witness denied it. A private complaint was filed to introduce a new story and increase the number of accused, in the private complaint the complainant himself was not an eyewitness to the incident and his evidence is based on hearing, hostility was acknowledged between the parties. The deceased witness, the deceased's mother was also a witness to the incident as the deceased was not a resident of the place, but he failed to clearly state his presence on the spot, witnesses said in the FIR The four witnesses contradicted each other on material points. Present as court witnesses, it was specifically stated that the incident in this case was minimal, indicated by four unidentified assailants whose ocular evidence in private complaints could not be identified. , Not encouraged by the trust, otherwise, the delay of more than three years in filing a private complaint is not reasonably explained. Eyewitnesses could not be ruled out, who was assigned a major role in hurting the deceased co-accused, in the absence of independent encroachments against the current accused. No proven weapons recovery suspected, suspects acquitted on suspicion of circumstance immigration advocates phone number from Chawinda lawyer