Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HALEEM versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR KHAN

Section 24 (1) after submitting one-third of the amount prematurely, 30 days after the date of filing of the suit record, it was disclosed that the case was filed on 17.5 2000, which came on the same day. And the trial court required the plaintiff to submit 1/1. 15 The third admission position of the sale price up to 6000 was that the amount was deposited on 17 6 2000 and thereafter the extension request was transferred which was rejected by the trial court and the plaintiff rejected the plaintiff. Was rejected on the order of which the deposit amount was made in 185 2000 and the impression was that the deposit was to be made within 30 days from the date mentioned before this order was declared as fake. Was given an extension that was not pressurized. The provisions of section 24 (1) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 and the grounds for extension of time, were initially made, hence the wrong suit, properly dismissed in the circumstances. list of advocates from Jhang lawyer