Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FAREED versus DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER, WESTERN BAR CANAL DIVISION THINGI DISTRICT VEHARI

Section AA [as amended by the Canal and Sewage (Amendment) Act (XVII of 2006)] provides that the law justifying the maintenance of the fur without notice and inquiry provides that the sub divisional canal officer shall be discharged Was before the KHAL restoration order was passed. Inquire Yourself In the present case, the Sub Divisional Canal Officer did not carry out the required inquiry in accordance with Section 68A of the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, on the basis of some inquiries made by the field staff regarding the order of KHAL restoration. Could not be done. It is considered to be lawful and lawful, so all subsequent actions were declared to be the result of a false order. They were also invalid and the sub-divisional canal officer, who was not durable, was directed by the High Court to pass Section 68A. Ensure new action under the amended provisions. Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 law websites from Jamshoro lawyer