Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF BAIG

Section 13, Right to authorization, use of the evidence on file The right of the courts to claim the incidental allegations leveled against them by the plaintiff on the sale of the wrongdoer, Plaintiff disclosed that the plaintiff had a dispute with the plaintiff about the controversial sale on 27 8 2000. It was found out and made its first offer immediately, along with the Talb trial court, and the appellate court dismissed the case on the ground that the plaintiff in his examination told the Chief that the knowledge of the sale date was 27 8 2000 Instead, it was 279 2000, Validia's arrest, the evidence on the record suggests that the date was the result of a slip of the language 279 or incorrectly at trial. The recorded case was to read the evidence rather than to read the case incorrectly, after reading the entire evidence, it can be concluded that the plaintiff had stated 278000, especially when the plaintiff himself suggested that He learned of the controversial sale in August. There is no contradiction in the statements of the 2000 witnesses; the notice of the students was also confirmed by the witnesses' testimony and the delivery of the notice was also proved on record. The copy of the sale deed submitted by the defendant / Wendy was disclosed. It has been imposed a stamp duty of Rs. 60,000. The defendant, therefore, was entitled to pay these charges and the High Court declared the suit to be a total deposit. \ R \ n famous supreme court advocate from Dudial lawyer