Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NADEEM versus D.P.O.

In the Section 22A Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 appellant alleges that he had booked and loaded cotton bales on the respondent-operated vehicle. It was reported that the bales of cotton had been robbed due to the robbery. The petition was dismissed by the Justice Justice of Peace seeking the registration of a criminal case related to the presence of a robber before Justice Peace under Section 22A, CCPC, but the Constitutional petition was accepted by the plaintiff by the High Court. And the relevant DPO was directed to file a case. Ensure Defendant's Complaint and its Fair and Neutral Inquiry Legitimate Status The High Court looked into Defendant's version in an independent context Defendant's case was that there was a robbery in which 10/12 people were involved. The truck with the number and the defendant and two of his assistants were taken to a secluded place on the gunpowder. The defendant's respondent's car was looted from the vehicle and his case was that of a free set of independent witnesses and suspects. Based on this, there is no restriction in the registration of the second FIR by the respondent High Court. Intra-court appeal of criminal case dismissed immigration advocate from Pishin lawyer