REHMAT DIN AND OTHERS versus MIRZA NASIR ABBAS
O XV, R 5 Appeal Canceled, Request for Restoration of Non-Prosecution Appeal Delays Appeal for Delay of Appeal Delay with Delay of 621 Days It was not mentioned in the petitioners' effect. Such conduct would be like concealing material facts from the court. Such right shall not be sufficient to exercise equitable jurisdiction / discretion only in favor of it. Applicant's Name The relevant lawyer was mentioned in the list due to the relevant date; after dismissing the appeal against the applicant, the applicant filed the petition against the applicant. Did not respond to such request, which shows that they did not contact their lawyer after the leave, the applicants failed to explain the delay of each day. Upon expiry of the Supreme Court's dismissal for the delay of 84 days, the rights of the defendant were gathered in favor of the defendant with time restriction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Sanjwal lawyer