MUHAMMAD JAMSHED versus STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Judicial Magistrate while performing the duties of the reader Rs 1,500 for confirming the bonds of the accused. What was asked An excuse was made in the bail granted by the accused in the complainant's brother's bail, or another senior civil judge raided the district and session judge's direction and obtained the stained money with the file. The NIC's bond and three photocopies of the bail and the identification application in which the accused had obtained the loan showed that the tainted money was recovered from it, as well as the High Court's thorough examination of the entire evidence. On all material aspects of the case, which did not face any misrepresentation or reading of evidence, no unlawful or infirmity could be identified in the unidentified verdict. The leave of appeal was denied under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Khanpur lawyer