GHULAM MURTAZA AND ANOTHER versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), to some extent the appeal against the acquittal of the accused was the same as that of the accompanying accused who has been acquitted on the basis of the same evidence which the High Court has given for reasons. Are given in the extension. The benefit of suspecting the suspects was neither irrelevant, nor was there any weakness, illegality and abortion of justice not disclosed in an unconstitutional decision to record the repression of the evidence Medical Evidence Injury Seat, Injury Can confirm the ocular evidence in relation to the nature of , A weapon of some kind was used in the incident, but it would not link the suspect to the commission of the crime on which the accused's conviction was based, and the use of discretion by the High Court accepted the appeal of the criminal justice. Was in accordance with the principles. Were excluded accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Samundri lawyer