Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM MURTAZA AND ANOTHER versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM


Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), to some extent the appeal against the acquittal of the accused was the same as that of the accompanying accused who has been acquitted on the basis of the same evidence which the High Court has given for reasons. Are given in the extension. The benefit of suspecting the suspects was neither irrelevant, nor was there any weakness, illegality and abortion of justice not disclosed in an unconstitutional decision to record the repression of the evidence Medical Evidence Injury Seat, Injury Can confirm the ocular evidence in relation to the nature of , A weapon of some kind was used in the incident, but it would not link the suspect to the commission of the crime on which the accused's conviction was based, and the use of discretion by the High Court accepted the appeal of the criminal justice. Was in accordance with the principles. Were excluded accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Samundri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.