MUHAMMAD AZIZUR REHMAN versus LIAQUAT ALI
The suit for recovery of the loan amount based on Section 118 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, RR 1 & 2 Pro Note and its receipt has been denied by the defendant in the written statement, but The admission test must have the same effect as the guarantee for the business with the plaintiff's effect where the negotiating instrument was filed, then the burden of proof for not considering it was by its Associate of Negoshi. Falls under section 118 of the Portable Instruments Act, 1881, provided that an exchangeable instrument was made / prepared for consideration until its dismissal is proved. Defendant failed to prove non-payment of evidence through independent and deadly evidence, while in the circumstances the suit was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Hunza Nagar lawyer