Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE AND OTHERS

Section 4 324 and II 304 Part II / 34 34 The accused with the Principal Co-accused, who is the witness of the evidence, armed with both armed burglaries, arrived at the scene when the Principal Co-accused struck the deceased and killed the deceased. Given that the co-accused on his input had gone missing due to compromise with the deceased's legal heritage, or that the injuries he suffered were initially caused by a minor electrical power dispute, But then the accused, along with the co-accused, were fully prepared with the joint intention of taking revenge on the victim and, thus, he was ready for the murder of the deceased. Who was responsible, in law for sentencing the accused under Section 242424 was wrong, PPC accused was convicted under Section result of this. 304 Part II / 34, PP: C (Old) and Seven Years Prison power of attorney advocate Kotmomin lawyer