Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM, A.S.-I. versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SHEIKHUPURA RANGE, LAHORE

Section 8 Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R22 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Promotion Claim in the date of service of the Appellant from the service tribunal for pre-promotion ad hoc appointment. The Appeal for Development was finally rejected by the relevant authority, before the Appellant filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal's correctness appeal was accepted on the sole basis that any private reply. Voters who feared to be implicated did not file any objection; there was no concept of ad hoc promotion in police rules, As an appellant's propaganda, a section I had to consider as an offsetting promotion had to be confirmed by the police rules, from the date of its progress on successful completion of the police investigation. None of the respondents' service records were disclosed by the public respondents as they were removed from certification by the DA, in fact, the applicant's late entry into the relevant publicity lists of the A section. Developed because the applicant was barred from entering the required examinations, namely, the Lower School Course and the Intermediate Class Course Appellant, in the circumstances entitled to the section as seniority. I was developing it from that day immigration advocates contact from Kamra lawyer