Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE

Complaint of section 161 evidence moved complainant on the basis of displeasure with some public servant, taking contradictory position in the FIR, the complainant filed the FIR with the name or other details of the accused and any Did not mention settlement. When the accused moved the bail application in court, the complainant could not be relied upon as the sole witness to prove the case against the accused. The hearing of the conversations between the accused and the complainant and the transfer of money between them by the raiding magistrate was fatal to the prosecution's version of the facts and circumstances of the case which the deputy Qasim had with the complainant and the magistrate. Was indicated. And the investigating officer, on the basis of which the suspect was caught red-handed, was not presented to rt and was dismissed as unnecessary witness. inheritance advocates near Shankiari lawyer