Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE


Complaint of section 161 evidence moved complainant on the basis of displeasure with some public servant, taking contradictory position in the FIR, the complainant filed the FIR with the name or other details of the accused and any Did not mention settlement. When the accused moved the bail application in court, the complainant could not be relied upon as the sole witness to prove the case against the accused. The hearing of the conversations between the accused and the complainant and the transfer of money between them by the raiding magistrate was fatal to the prosecution's version of the facts and circumstances of the case which the deputy Qasim had with the complainant and the magistrate. Was indicated. And the investigating officer, on the basis of which the suspect was caught red-handed, was not presented to rt and was dismissed as unnecessary witness.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Saidu Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.