Find a Lawyer

MST. SAJIDA BIBI versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (b), 460 and 34 was pronounced late at 11:00 pm and during the interrogation, two unidentified suspects who were murdered with robbers were immediately sued by the accused's wife. However, the case was reversed and the victim's complainant / wife was made an accused who allegedly conspired with others in the murder of her husband, who lives in U Section A and his absence. I allegedly had illicit relations with one of them. None of the 15 prosecution witnesses presented by the prosecution had seen the actual incident of murder and robbery at the victim's house; one of the key witnesses was the father of the accused and the other was the real brother of the victim. Statements cannot be. It relied on it as it was reported that the CIA police had recorded statements of all the prosecution witnesses four months after the incident. There were also interested witnesses because of the dispute over the property case, they filed a case against the victim's wife, who was himself the complainant, but was involved by the witnesses involved in the case. Both witnesses said they had accused the victim / complainant of illicit relations with his wife. One of the accused failed to give an example when he saw the deceased's wife and said that he was the accused during the adultery and did not reveal the source of their information in this way. The allegation was based solely on the suspicion that the prosecution's witnesses were likely to make such an allegation us immigration advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer