Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ENGINEER, WAPDA versus MANZOOR AHMAD

Sections 4, 18, 23, 28 and 54 Reimbursement of Compensation The reference to the Court of Appeal has been referred to by the Land Acquisition Collector, awarding landowners the acquisition of land assessing property value. Compensation was allowed under section 23 of the Act. Satisfied with this amount of money paid at the rate of Rs. 12,864 per acre, the landowners prayed for reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, the referee court along with other incidental charges authority, paid Rs. Fixed In its first appeal in favor of which the land was obtained, the decision of the referee court was challenged to prove that the landowners had the average market value of such land during the twelve periods based on similar value. Had failed to produce any reliable, reliable evidence. The acquisition of agricultural land by the collector of legal evidence of acid by collecting the ground for the months prior to the date of publication of the notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was agricultural land and the village concerned during the important period. No agricultural land was sold, in the absence of any such evidence, the only proof that can be considered is the value of such land in the same adjoining village and the price from Rs 12,864 per acre. The price has been raised to Rs 24,518 per acre, the referee court said this is a formula, but only the average sales price of one Made an error. The referee court's findings, based on similar land sales in adjacent villages and two other adjoining villages, were not based on proper scrutiny of the evidence. This is the cover of justice list of supreme court advocates from Shorkot lawyer