Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT NO.1, GUJRANWALA

Sections 324 and 353 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Explosives Act (XI of 1908), Sections 3 and 4 of Pakistan (1973) ), Article 199 Constitutional petition Transferring the case from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the General Court was made solely on the power of the police witnesses, not one of the public was investigated, despite the availability of public witnesses on the occasion. From which weapons and empty cells were collected. Instead of presenting the incident, the forensic scientist was not sent to prove the fact that the blanks were fired from the firearms allegedly recovered by the applicants / accused Prima. There was no content in the file that the suspect had resorted to. Firing on the police party did not hurt any police officer, even though the indiscriminate firing by the applicants was blamed against the members of the police party. A large number of policemen were fired by the applicant in the police party. The fact file was not brought in by an independent source, did not fall within the purview of sections 6 and 7 of the Applicants' Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The jurisdiction authorized for the trial was transferred to the General Court best law firms from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer