Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD ALIAS SHERA versus SARWAR

Section 54 Permanent Order for Permanent Prohibition Both Applicants and Respondents Filed for Permanent Order Prohibition Both Cases were Stabilized Trial Court dismissed the case filed by Respondents while praying An appeal was filed by the applicant, in which the appellate court affirmed the trial court's orders. The respondents stated that there was a disruption and a way in the relevant measles numbers and they prayed for the injunction to prevent the applicant from interfering or demolishing the route and the existence of Khalil was not disputed. Because that is how Akbar was founded by Shejra. To the extent that the complainant but the petitioner has stated that there is no way in the deficit number, as per the record of the respondents it has been shown that there is only one pure dispute and the following is the case of the net courts. There is no evidence to pass along. , The order in favor of the respondents to prevent the applicant was mistaken by the injunction M is eroding the affected decrees, obliged to change the impression that they were retained to the extent of the conflict, but a The boundary was kept aside to that extent. family advocate from Chashma lawyer