Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

Section 2 302 (c) Evidence Definition Site plan showed that there were shops on both sides in a densely populated market, but no witnesses were presented by the prosecution even to the enmity between the parties. Was also denied. Prosecutors testified that five suspects were shown on the spot who allegedly fired at the victim with various firearms, but the suspect was reported to have been armed with 30 bore pistols that found no pistol at the scene and only 7 mm. Empty space was found. The rifle was recovered, even after the arrest of the accused, no weapon of culpability was recovered from the accused Palia, was admitted by the investigating officer and the investigating officer added that the victim The son of KK's real brother had made a statement before him that the accused was not. He was present at the time of the incident and that he was not recovered. Both witnesses were related to the deceased and they were outraged by the accused number. There was a free association because no independent witness was present before the police or the trial court. It was, in order to maintain guilt on the capital's allegations, especially when the two parties hated each other, free cooperation was essential, which they lacked. The complaining party was also involved in the murder of another person, who was also confessed by both witnesses, the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any doubt to maintain the conviction, The trial court's decision on the trial was set aside and the accused was sent to trial female advocates from Faisalabad lawyer