MST. ABIDA ALTAF versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sections 122 and 118 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Sections 14 and 19 and Article 86 (a) Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII R 11 Claim of the Limitation Question Claim to the Claimant's Scope The application for an insurance tribunal was denied by the insurance tribunal on the grounds that it was banned at the same time. The claimant's assertion was that the question of limitation was a mixed question of law and fact and could not be precisely rejected, the insured died late on 18 3 2010 and the insurance corporation filed the insurance claim on 7 5 2012. Rejected. Subsequently, the claimant's application was filed before the Insurance Tribunal on 12 1, 2013, the question of limitation was a mixed question of law and facts and could not be decided. Without recording the evidence and failing to consider the application of sections 14 and 19 of the Insurance Tribunal Limitation Act 1908 and the claimant could not apply, Article 86 (a) of the Limitation Act 1908, applying Article 86 (a) of the Limitation Act 1908 (A) be summarily rejected if the claimant's claim was payable, whereas in the present case, the claimant's claim was denied, and the insurance tribunal ignored this aspect of the matter when unknown. Approving the order, the High Court has put aside the unidentified order and moved the case to the Insurance Tribunal for a new decision. Demand was.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
