MST. RIFFAT PARVEEN versus REGIONAL DIRECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT MULTAN REGION, MULTAN
Section 5A West Pakistan Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, R2 (e) Constitution of Pakistan, Section 199 Constitution Petition Securing Job Based on Fake Documents and Fake Documents, which was the first cousin of the applicant's ex-husband, In his application, the Executive District Officer filed the complaint and complained that the applicant had obtained employment on the basis of fake documents and fake documents. Three consecutive investigations were conducted against the applicant, but he was asked to apologize in the inquiries. Was found and despite such ancestry he was given a clean chit. The notice was sent to the applicant requesting that the Anti-Corruption Establishment be patient, that the thin-skinned lady was fed up with the administration of justice as she was harassed by the designated law enforcement applicant in high regard. Was going The court officials should be directed to refrain from harassing her in the name of Ink, a helpless woman who was subjected to repeated inquiries by the Anti-Corruption Establishment in the name of illegal forgery, on the basis of which she was charged. She was able to get a job in the department under Anti KR2 (E). The Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985, may allow authorized authorities to inquire or register a criminal case or exclude a case, but under the rules, the unlimited, restrained and unauthorized authority to issue an order with the authorized authority was not. Conduct an inquiry after a person has been prosecuted, unless the victim either accepts the complainant's requirements, or the anti-corruption
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
