Orders approved by Section 19 (7) (a), 19 and 27 Civil Code of Conduct (V 1908), AXXI, RR 23 A, 29 and Section 47 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Banking Court. Implemented OXI, R29, CCC under OCCI, R23A, CPC Scope Decreaseholder / Financial Institution executed in the pending order of the bankruptcy court's pending order. The proceedings of the proceedings were stopped until the trial case. The requirement of the decree / financial institution for the declaration filed by the decision-makers was that this unwanted order was passed, ignoring the provisions of the XXI, R 23A, CPC, and that the financial institution The decision and the decree passed in favor of has been finalized. He then turned to the execution, and if the verdict of the verdict had raised some verbal objection, such objections could not be considered, nor in CPC 23 R, AXXI. This can be stopped from the view of the current bar. The transfer of the Financial Institution was the right to money, and in the terms of O XXI, R 23 A, CPC, even the objection to the mini-decree cannot be considered until the judgment debtor has paid a sum of money in court. Not submitted or have a hearing on a security dispute. In view of A. XXI, R 29, the CPC was misunderstood because the decision-maker had claimed ownership of the mortgage imported by it and is now claiming that the machinery auction Has been done and the data has been satisfied. And such a contradiction was the unclean order of the banking court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
