HYUNDAI CORPORATION versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED
O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), suit for section 54 Permanent Order withholding Bank Guarantee, the provision for the provisional injunction granting the scope bank guarantee was a special type of contract that, in the event of a particular event, Depends on Was eliminated, the guarantee will be terminated, the bank guarantee was an independent agreement between the parties in which the same was issued and the bank which issued the bank guarantee to the same guarantee cannot be stopped. The order can be banned by issuing a restraining order. The guarantee was independent of the obligations of the parties to the contract. After the evidence was presented, the fact was to be proved when the plaintiff temporarily failed to present the first case for breach of order, not complying with the obligations disclosed by the bank guarantee. Through an agreement between the parties that was independent which includes its own terms and conditions if the plaintiff has a complaint against the fulfillment of the terms of the contract and has filed specific performance by the plaintiff in case of permanent injunction Bank guarantees had nothing to do with the alleged dispute between the parties. The contractual obligations of the parties imposed by their terms and conditions must be freely decided. The impeachment order approved by the appellate court was in accordance with the law; the trial court was instructed to decide the case within a certain time period, revision of the circumstances was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
