SHAFIQ SUPREME RICE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED versus BANK AL-FALAH LIMITED
Sections 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, Rr 10 & 11 Suit Declaration, Order Dismissal, Damage Receipt and Declaration against Documents on Bank's Rejection, Order Dismissal, Damages The lawsuit was filed to recover the. Cancellation of Documents Plaintiff Demands Plaintiff's Rejection Under O VII, R 11, CPC Plaintiff Raised by User That After the Leave Approval to Defend the Case, Banking Court Obligates to Record Evidence And the issue of maintaining the matter could not be decided. The banking court of law had the power to apply O VII, Rr 10 & 11, CPC at any stage of the proceedings, therefore, the defendants' claim that the evidence was required to be recorded after the leave order was approved. Such claims were not considered because the plaintiff was in loss due to non-payment of financial assistance but the plaintiff's letter had no reference to the approved letter anywhere in violation. NDent BankPlant specifically mentions that the financing facility was approved in the year 2008 and thereafter no financial contribution. Was not granted and there was nothing in this case under which the plaintiff bank was required to provide further financial assistance to the plaintiff, in the absence of such requirements, he was liable to dismiss, under the circumstances, to the plaintiff. Was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
