Find a Lawyer

SYED QAISER ABBAS versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS THROUGH CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD

Sections 3 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4, dismissing the appellant from employment, were told that during the course of the investigation it was found that the money was run by cash of section C (reservation). Is less than And it said that the C-section (reservation) denied payment to the appellant's record, along with other officials, that it was shown that the authorities could not provide evidence regarding the appellant's involvement in this disconnected amount. Were. And it also failed to prove that the appellant had made his alleged contribution to the deferred amount of money. The police inquiry had not made any progress in establishing any charges against the appellant, leading to the removal of employees from the fines. , Was imposed on the appellant without regular action. Inquiries were denied the opportunity for the appellant to present his own evidence or to examine the prosecution's witnesses if any previous conviction of the appellant was requested and the statement of allegations / allegations was denied. I have illustrated this, only to strengthen the department's case. The unwanted order was set in one direction so that the applet could be restored to service with all previous benefits. power of attorney advocate Bhakkar lawyer