RAB NAWAZ CHAUDHRY versus BEGUM NUSRAT MAQBOOL
Sections 7 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXI, R 89 Appeal against the Order of Implementation of Order for the Recovery of Debt Amount with Interest, allowed the Appellate Court to continue its execution Went, but refused to confirm the sale until the decision of the stay application was executed by the auction buyer, and the sale of the mortgaged property applied itself as a respondent in the appeal. The High Court disposed of the request for appeal by directing the applicant to submit an undisclosed sum and separating the auction with the order to pay the appellant. The debtor for the interest justification decision did not apply for sale separately under O XXI, R 89, allowing the CPC auction proceeding under the direction of the High Court, which apparently That includes the purchase of the property through the auction buyer HC. Any such order relating to the auction proceedings may be approved, the High Court is in its power to accept payment already made by the judgment debtor and the balance is paid after the completion of the decree. Whichever payment was paid to the bank, while the rest of the interest amount was ordered to be paid by the High Court, the decision of the High Court was not decided by the Supreme Court. I dismissed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer