Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus GOHAR RIAZ

Section 6 (1) (2) Removal from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 3 [Amended] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Removal of Employee Services for Misconduct and Exercise ? Only show-cause notice was issued against the employee under the Political Impact Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 for self-employment in the department and there is no full inquiry as to the deliberations under Section 5 of the said ordinance. Was not The trial was held for two years, only the person appointed by the initial appointment, development or exchange could be hired on probation and ad hoc basis and the fact that the person was clearly excluded. Was appointed and placed on probation for a period of time. The circular of the department-issued seniority list, clearly stating the formal nature of his initial appointment for two years, reinforces his claim after the showcase notice to the employee that he was a permanent employee because the seniority list was only regular. Or was created in the case of permanent employees. The employer's department admits that the initial appointment of public servants was violated without any political pressure because the department was unable to do so. On the record to prove that the employee lacked the required qualifications and was not appointed by the competent authority, the employee cannot be penalized for any act or omission of the department for terminating the employment of the employee. Is. Simply because the department committed irregularities in violation of the procedure for self-appointment, while giving a large sentence, a proper inquiry was required according to the law. property advocates from Dijkot lawyer