Find a Lawyer

REHMATULLAH AND OTHERS versus SALEH KHAN

Sections 8 and 42 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 454 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), revenge of the seller in section 42 suit, vendor's revenge before the Revenue Officer for Rs. Receipts were acknowledged as the value of the receipt, and could not say how much money he received. Wendy alleged that the seller had received Rs 1,000 as the sale price, meanwhile the Revenue Officer. Such contradictory statements and parties of the parties ordered the change in the presence of Seller Revenue Officer's legal heirs. Referring to the receipt of Rs 240 in the absence of the seller's legal heritage, the authenticated vendor knew nothing about being an illiterate woman. Unable to understand variable mutation and nature of the transaction The vendor never accepted the sale price receipt Nothing was expected on the record to establish the alleged sale price payment, Transaction verification fraud And the result of the collusion was, thus, ineffective in the interests of the claimant as successor to the claimant \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Noor kot lawyer