Find a Lawyer

GUL SADBAR versus MALIK-UD-DIN

Section 302 (b) of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2B), all the circumstances of the appeal case in particular Was based on These circumstances together point to the suspect who was the complainant in the FIR, and he did not appeal to argue that the attackers mentioned in the FIR who came from other villages and their escaped enemies The victim was also able to enter the house of the deceased woman and will flee despite the fact that her enemies were available to the unarmed people in the house as an easy target, as shown by the complainant in the FIR. Not only was it unnatural and incredible, but it was beyond the cultural norms of enmity in the area. He had pointed to his crime in a wrongful FIR by the accused. Another indication of the defendant's guilty mind was that he did not contact Polk in connection with the progress of his FIR and made himself disrespectful to the police with additional judicial confession witnesses. It was natural because the only way to survive was the extra-judicial confession made by the accused. It was further confirmed that he was presented to the police by the same witnesses, had a pleasant relationship with the family and that no husband would impose any capital against his wife's real brother unless it was absolutely Not to be true and this case has further supported the prosecution's story. The accused recovered a pistol, based on the crime weapon, once the offender had intended to commit a murder, it was his inheritance advocates near Nowshero Feroz lawyer